Comparison
Costable — Parametric Should-Cost Analysis vs ECC
ECC has more GitHub stars (281,307 vs 0). ECC was updated more recently (last commit 2d ago). Data comes straight from GitHub and refreshes daily.
Costable — Parametric Should-Cost Analysis
Parametric should-cost: P50/P80/P90 estimates, 801 materials, 25 countries, quote review.
$
claude mcp add --transport http costable-parametric-should-cos https://costable.ai/api/mcp
ECC
The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.
$
/plugin marketplace add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC| Metric | Costable — Parametric Should-Cost Analysis | ECC |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP server | MCP server |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 281,307 |
| Stars, last 7 days | n/a | +1,108 |
| Forks | 0 | 41,827 |
| Upvotes | 0 | 1 |
| Language | n/a | JavaScript |
| License | n/a | MIT |
| Last commit | n/a | 2d ago |
| Created | n/a | Jan 2026 |
| Categories | n/a | AI & LLM tooling, Memory & knowledge, Security |